Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- podcasts:darkhorse:episode_14_-_virus_derangement_syndrome [2020/05/15 10:48] – angelegt hkolbe
+++ podcasts:darkhorse:episode_14_-_virus_derangement_syndrome [2020/05/15 16:04] – [DarkHorse Podcast: Episode 14 - Virus Derangement Syndrome] hkolbe
@@ Zeile 1: / Zeile 1: @@
-====== Episode 14 - Virus Derangement Syndrome ======
+====== DarkHorse Podcast: Episode 14 - Virus Derangement Syndrome ======
-  * 12.05.2020
+  * Veröffentlicht am: 12.05.2020
+  * Beteiligte: Bret Weinstein, Heather Heying
   * Youtube: [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6-xwaHU4f4|Bret and Heather 14th DarkHorse Podcast Livestream: Virus Derangement Syndrome]]
-  * Themen: [[wpde>Fehlerkultur]]; Sozial-Bindung;, Befähigung zum rationalen, klaren Denken
+  * Themen: [[wpde>Fehlerkultur]]; Lügen; Humor; Sozial-Bindung; Befähigung zum rationalen, klaren Denken; Umgang mit Unsicherheit;
-<blockquote>[As a professor being asked by stutdents for "live advice":] Don't even consider marrying anybody who doesn't have a sense of humor about themselves. They're just not marriage material - which [...] is a upsetting problem because there are a lot of people in that category and it's sad to think that they may not be appropiate for a relationship.
+===== Transkript =====
-<cite>Bret Weinstein, DarkHorse Podcast, Ep. 14</cite></blockquote>
+<blockquote>[As a professor being asked by students for "live advice":] **Don't even consider marrying anybody who doesn't have a sense of humor about themselves.** They're just not marriage material - which [...] is a upsetting problem because there are a lot of people in that category and it's sad to think that they may not be appropiate for a relationship.
-{{tag>Fehlerkultur}}
+[...]
+**One thing you can tell very frequently what kind of person someone is, based on how they deal with the discovery that they have been incorrect. **
+One thing you can do is: you can rationalize and sweep it under the rug and pretend it didn't happen - now you're wrong twice! Not only were you wrong the first time but your claim to have always been in the position you now hold is also wrong.
+That is not a indication of character.
+[...]
+I would very much like to be right. I don't like dicovering that I'm wrong and doing it in front of a large audience is very  difficult, but the point is: Wow, is it a better deal than sticking with some wrong position, so it's not to admit that you made an error - which is of course human.
+<cite>[[https://youtu.be/p6-xwaHU4f4?t=689|Bret Weinstein, DarkHorse Podcast, Ep. 14, 11:28 - 13:42]]</cite></blockquote>
+<blockquote>It's hard [...]. When do you say: [a)] I'm putting my internal estimation at 95% on this thing and I'm go ahead and say it without the "errorbars built in" and then maybe it's that one in 20 times that I was wrong, you do have to come back and fix it.
+Or [b)] you speak in terms of uncertainties and probabilities and more often then not not numbers explicitly but implicit numerical thinking, quantitative thinking: that drives a lot of people crazy!
+Not just because our educational system is so bad, that most people who should completely be able to understand some quantitative thinking actually can't - through no fault of their own (often).
+But it also doesn't fit with a landscape of "buy-it-now! get your answer! be on your way, have the thing in your back pocket, that you have to say when someone asks you a question and don't think about it ever again."
+There is no "[[https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/set-and-forget|set and forget]]" over in scientific discovery space. You can't do it that way.
+<cite>[[https://youtu.be/p6-xwaHU4f4?t=822|Heather Heying, DarkHorse Podcast, Ep. 14, 13:42 - 14:51]]</cite></blockquote>
+{{tag>Fehlerkultur Erkenntnisvermögen Kognition}}