Unterschiede

Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.

--- podcasts:darkhorse:episode_14_-_virus_derangement_syndrome [2020/05/15 12:11] – [DarkHorse Podcast: Episode 14 - Virus Derangement Syndrome] hkolbe
+++ podcasts:darkhorse:episode_14_-_virus_derangement_syndrome [2020/10/11 17:43] (aktuell) – [Transkript] hkolbe
@@ Zeile 4: / Zeile 4: @@
   * Youtube: [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6-xwaHU4f4|Bret and Heather 14th DarkHorse Podcast Livestream: Virus Derangement Syndrome]]
   * Themen: [[wpde>Fehlerkultur]]; Lügen; Humor; Sozial-Bindung; Befähigung zum rationalen, klaren Denken; Umgang mit Unsicherheit;
 ===== Transkript =====
-<blockquote>[As a professor being asked by students for "live advice":] **Don't even consider marrying anybody who doesn't have a sense of humor about themselves.** They're just not marriage material - which [...] is a upsetting problem because there are a lot of people in that category and it's sad to think that they may not be appropiate for a relationship.
+<blockquote>%%[As a professor being asked by students for "live advice":]%% **Don't even consider marrying anybody who doesn't have a sense of humor about themselves.** They're just not marriage material - which %%[...]%% is a upsetting problem because there are a lot of people in that category and it's sad to think that they may not be appropiate for a relationship.
-[...]
+%%[...]%%
 **One thing you can tell very frequently what kind of person someone is, based on how they deal with the discovery that they have been incorrect. **
@@ Zeile 16: / Zeile 15: @@
 One thing you can do is: you can rationalize and sweep it under the rug and pretend it didn't happen - now you're wrong twice! Not only were you wrong the first time but your claim to have always been in the position you now hold is also wrong.
-That is now a indication of character.
+That is not a indication of character.
-[...]
+%%[...]%%
 I would very much like to be right. I don't like dicovering that I'm wrong and doing it in front of a large audience is very  difficult, but the point is: Wow, is it a better deal than sticking with some wrong position, so it's not to admit that you made an error - which is of course human.
@@ Zeile 26: / Zeile 25: @@
-<blockquote>It's hard [...]. When do you say: [a)] I'm putting my internal estimation at 95% on this thing and I'm go ahead and say it without the "errorbars built in" and then maybe it's that one in 20 times that I was wrong, you do have to come back and fix it.
+<blockquote>It's hard %%[...]%%. When do you say: %%[a)]%% I'm putting my internal estimation at 95% on this thing and I'm go ahead and say it without the "errorbars built in" and then maybe it's that one in 20 times that I was wrong, you do have to come back and fix it.
-Or [b)] you speak in terms of uncertainties and probabilities and more often then not not numbers explicitly but implicit numerical thinking, quantitative thinking: that drives a lot of people crazy!
+Or %%[b)]%% you speak in terms of uncertainties and probabilities and more often then not not numbers explicitly but implicit numerical thinking, quantitative thinking: that drives a lot of people crazy!
 Not just because our educational system is so bad, that most people who should completely be able to understand some quantitative thinking actually can't - through no fault of their own (often).
@@ Zeile 41: / Zeile 40: @@
-{{tag>Fehlerkultur Erkenntnisvermögen Kognition}}
+{{tag>PodCast Fehlerkultur Erkenntnisvermögen Kognition}}